Lord Of The Flies By William Golding Philosophy Essay

overlord Of The Flies By William Golding ism EssayIn this paper I chose to analyze the sacred scripture Lord of the flies written by William Golding as I believe it matches rattling come up the field of organizational theory by presenting the contrast in the midst of different styles of attractorshiphip and the opposed actions of cardinal truly different leadership. I will emphasize four types of leadership styles parliamentary, autocratic, laissez-faire and charismatic. I chose this book because in the clean, leadership plays a very important role, as it does in real life for us, because the characters need to face some sense of gage in secernate for them to survive.The military postal leadership theory proposes that leaders choose the beat course of action based upon situational variables. Different styles of leadership may be more appropriate for certain types of decision-making for theoretical account in a situation where the leader is the most knowledgeable and experienced member of a gathering, an autocratic style might be most appropriate, in other instances where stem members atomic tour 18 skilled experts, a democratic style would be more effective. The fundamental underpinning of the situational leadership theory is that thither is no single beaver style of leadership. Effective leadership is task-relevant, and the most successful leaders are those that adapt their leadership style to the maturity of the individual or group they are examineing to lead or influence. Effective leadership varies, not unless with the person or group that is organism influenced, however it alike dep barricades on the task, job or function that necessarily to be accomplished. (http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situational_leadership_theory)The existence of humans being on earth relies on various factors the basic needs for humanness to survive are food, water, shelter, but these are only the physical needs of man. earthly concern also take ho ld social and mental needs which submit the existence of lawfulness in ordination to be able to coexist peaceablenessfully with themselves, the nature and the environment. The only representation that law and order bum be get throughd in human society is by a high authority, or some form of government or leader. William Golding tries to touch on some of these aspects of our civilization through the various characters he creates in his fabrication Lord of the Flies. (http//www.bookrags.com/essay-2005/12/13/185154/04/)The main theme of the novel is the skirmish between two opposed instincts that exist within all human beings the instinct to live by rules, act peacefully, follow moral commands, and observe the good of the group against the instinct to gratify peerlesss immediate desires, act violently to obtain supremacy over others, and enforce adepts will. The two main leaders in the story, through their similar and different leadership characteristics and objectives fig ht sticker and foregatherh to gain the discipline of the other boys on the island in order to gain the power to make the decisions that they feel should be made, sometimes for the bust of the entire group, and sometimes for their own purpose. The leaders which are presented throughout the novel all have their own method of leading, and serve different purposes. The select and democratic leader is Ralph while the self-appointed leader who tries to run a totalitarian society is diddley. In the beginning they work towards common goals, but eventually their different views on how to lead the group lead them into conflict.From the very beginning Ralph assumes primary responsibility for the groups tasks when he starts organizing their living, because he realizes that not doing so will result in furiousry and moral chaos (Hynes, 59). creation aware of the situation in which they are, Ralph uses neandertals idea of the conch and takes the role of gathering the survivors. When the bo ys follow in the island they automatically seek for some kind of law and order, since there are not any grown-ups. They call for to belong to a group, with someone in charge to lead them, and make them feel safe. Ralph becomes this person, after being chosen in a democratic election. He tries to hear what everybody has to say. permit him be chief with the trumpet thing (Golding, 30). The conch is a symbol of democracy because it entitles everyone to having an opinion in all matters of importance. It also symbolizes law and order, everything which Ralph stands for. Although he is judge as a leader in the beginning, his priorities as a leader and way of thinking create conflict with some of the others. Theres another thing. We roll in the hay help them to find us. If a ship comes near the island they might not notice us. So we must make a smoke on top of the mountain. We must make a fire. (Golding, 49)When one observes Ralphs actions, it becomes obvious that he is not only a ta sk-motivated leader, but also a democratic leader, which results from the fact that he leads an expedition through the forest in order to find out if the island is deserted or not. Ralph also wants shelters to be built where they flowerpot sleep, branches to be collected for a signal fire and a specific place beyond the bathing-pool to be used as a lavatory. Furthermore, he introduces rules when he tells the boys that they have to have Hands up deal at school (Golding, 31) and that only the person holding the conch is allowed to speak. In addition, the conch makes the boys feel they participate when holding it they get a chance to speak their soul and the others must listen. It is a significant trait for a democratic leader to aim for an environment of equality.Without a doubt, Ralph is also a relationship-motivated leader. He is kind-hearted and caring when he tries to comfort the littluns (Golding, 61) by saying there is no beast to be afraid of. He is interested in what the other boys think and he listens to them and what they have to say forrader he makes decisions. His close-hauled follower, Piggy, thinks a great deal about what has to be done and how they can do it and Ralph brings up Piggys ideas at the assemblies. In brief, these are all examples that validate the fact that Ralph is a complex leadership figure. He wants to be a sympathetic and egalitarian leader who does not turn away his responsibilities, but he is only twelve years old and has neither the experience take for the task, nor the support from the other boys.In the beginning, all the boys stand by the rules serve by Ralph. After a while this society starts to break up as man has a way of choosing the easiest way out. The boys get devolve of the responsibility and want to play, hunt and have fun. They do not want to get rescued as they are enjoying themselves too much.When moving on to the authoritarian leader, represented by Jack, we find a character who starts his assign for the role of leader at the very first assembly when he states that he is the compensateful leader of the schoolboys since he is the head boy in the choir. He is arrogant and disrespectful when he yells at his choir and bullies Piggy by screaming Shut up Fatty (Golding, 17). Jack feels chagrin when Ralph is elected. Although he temporarily gives in, Jack short starts using different strategies to corrupt Ralphs authority, and at the same time making himself more powerful. He stirs up the group by lying about Ralph having said that the hunters are dark at run. And even though Jack is the one who suggests that they need rules, and is wide awake to point out that the one who breaks them will be punished, he soon breaks them himself when he, for instance, speaks without holding the conch or makes himself heard above the other speakers (Olsen, 13). These actions are unopposed and weaken Ralphs leadership, and according to Kirsten Olsen it is the breaking of old rules and making his own (Olsen, 14) that paves the way for Jack coming to power.After being publicly humiliated when his attempt to have Ralph unseated fails, Jack decides to leave the group and have a fort of his own. Cunningly he tries to win people over from Ralphs camp by accusing him of being a coward and a bad hunter. Jack also offers the hungry boys meat if they leave Ralph and join his group instead. Not astonishingly most boys rather eat pork and play than pick berries and do tiresome chores under Ralphs command.As a result of Jacks behavior, one notices how Ralphs leadership style gradually changes into a laissez-faire leader. At one point he wonders what is going on Things are breaking up. I dont understand why. We began well we were happy (Golding, 87). Later he talks to the assembled boys and asks Which is better, law and rescue, or hunting and breaking things up?(Golding, 200). According to Ralph the first alternate(a) is the only possible one, but the others do not seem to control wi th him.Jack is a charismatic leader who paints his face with clay before he goes hunting for pigs. The hunters join Jack because they feel as if the cover on Jacks face commands them to do so. Most boys exclusively do what the leader says, or what the majority does, without thinking in terms of right and wrong or friendship, since they are afraid to be on their own, or even worse, a target of the other boys aggressions.Compared to the democratic leader Ralph, Jack is an authoritarian leader who yells at his peers to make his point, threatens them into obedience, makes them commit crimes as well as actually hurting them physically. An example of Jacks tactics when he finally is in power is the situation where he orders his subordinates to tie up the twins Sam and Eric, and then turns to Ralph, saying See? They do what I want (Golding, 199).As a consequence of Jacks increasing number of chase, Ralph finds himself being the leader of only a few boys. One person, though, who neer ab andons him is Piggy, the representative of common sense. He desperately tries to adjust the situation on the island to conditions more like those at home and he asks What are we? Humans? Or animals? Or savages? Whats grown-ups going to think? Going off hunting pigs letting fires out - (Golding, 98).Compared to Jack, who leads a primary group, the choir, Ralph, with the exception of Piggy, does not have a group of close and loyal allies. A typical example of how Ralph is betrayed by some of his followers is the actions of twins Sam and Eric. They try to avoid conflicts, and therefore never openly take a stand for Ralph. The end of Ralphs leadership is a fact when Jack and his band of hunters have killed Simon and Piggy, the two most devoted boys. There are no more boys to lead, and without followers Ralph can no longer be a leader.In conclusion, two leaders have different characteristics and priorities, which make them lead the group in different ways. Ralph is considered to be th e elected leader and Jack the self-appointed leader. These leaders have different skills and different views on how to create society, which leads them into many conflicts. This just goes to show that humans cannot be trusted with power, as power corrupts. The number Jack becomes the leader of his own group he turns into a savage and does things without thinking. The same can be said about governments in the terra firma today, who start wars with the purpose of fulfilling their own needs, and they do not mind harming others to achieve their goals and objectives. Maybe humans really are savages that cannot live in peace and coexist on this earth with all the animals and the environment. It might be quite an possible that Goldings view of humans as being the worst creatures on earth, is not very hard to comprehend, as you can relate to the conflicts created by leadership that are seen throughout the world.