Was the U.S. Right or Wrong Using the Atomic Bomb in ?Hiroshima? Essay

The history over few centuries shows that the Nipponese never gave up, that they always choose death than surrender. These two articles which I was study truly carefully, shows two opposite opinions about the necessity of apply the nuclear bomb to the end of World War II. Gar Alperowicz, in his article, Hiroshima Remembered The U.S. was rail at, the evidence to prove that America didnt need to use atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagashaki to end the war. Contrary to this article John Connnor in his article Hiroshima Remembered The U.S. was Right is trying to prove and convince reader that using atomic bomb on Hiroshima was necessary to end the war and it rescue tremendous amount of American and Japanese lives. John Connor is using very emotional and very graphic language in his article. He called Japanese the militarists who are implacable, relentless enemies for whom surrender was worse than death Their resistance was cruel to the end in each battle they participate. As a con firmation of this, he mentioned the battle in Tarawa in 1943 where besides 17 soldiers perch alive out of 5,000 soldiers when the island was taken. Another example is the battle in Saipan where only one thousand soldiers of 32,000 defending Japanese survived 10,000 civilians were killed, among them a lot of children. Japanese bashed their babies brains out of rocky cliff sides children threw grenades at each other.17,000 Americans ...