Race by the Numbers Essay

In his member, Race by the Numbers, Orlando Patterson argued about the misapprehension of the census results and that this mis education is having negative effects on the perspective of the people. The misinterpreted part of the census, tally to Patterson, was the appraisal that the tribe of the Whites is becoming the nonage in many beas of the country. Thus, Patterson offered arguments and ideas to overthrow the validity of the translation. However, the question is whether or not Patterson was capable to persuade the readers, the citizens, that the interpretation of the census report was indeed incorrect.Pattersons article is full of information especially statistical and quantitative information that helped him in establishing ground for his arguments. Patterson record that 48 percent of Latinos classified themselves as solely whitened (p. 83) adds to his cogent argument that is also back up by the next sentence in the article, Hispanics back locating be of any race ( p. 83). These statements clearly supported the incident that the replete(p) percentage of Whites in was decreased as interpreted by the census report.Patterson also included studies that affirm his claim including recent census result. Patterson stated that, whites will constitute 74. 8 percent of the total population in 2050, and that non-Hispanics will unagitated be 52. 8 percent of the total (p. 83) as indicated by the recent census. With such facts indicated in the article, it can be said that Patterson was able to build a strong evidence and load-bearing(a) detains and information regarding his assertions. Thus, his argument, regarding the population of white Americans in the country, is a gross contortion (Patterson p.83) is not a mere point of view but is supported by facts and relevant information. By establishing the facts and the arguments, it can be said that Pattersons main purpose of writing the article was to show that the population of whites in America is still and will continue to be the majority disproving the conjecture that non-Hispanic whites will cease to be the majority (Patterson, p. 82). By doing so, Patterson aims to encourage the whites that they still ar the majority and will continue to be. In this case, Patterson was able to do great job through his article.However, Patterson also indicated in his article the idea that each group in the new minority-majority country has longstanding grievances against whites, thus, Patterson may also want to claim the invalidity of this assertion through his article. simply in this case, was Patterson effective? Basing from the article, Patterson was really able to encourage the whites and memorise aside the dubiety that they will cease to be the majority. However, Patterson was not able to take away the idea that minority groups in America urinate grievances on whites.On the contrary, it even points out another idea, that whites does not see minority groups as to be equal to them. Thu s, instead of disproving the issue of minorities having grievances on whites, the article may even fuel the said issue. The article can touch off grievances against whites since the article establishes the idea that whites are and will continue to be the master race in the country. Therefore, this may ca usance insecurity and rebellion against the white race since others may wish to see the downfall of a first-rate race. Patterson also included historical developments in regarding some issues such as the classification of races.Patterson stated that, In 1930 Mexicans were classified as a class race by the Census Bureau which reclassified them as white in 1940, after protests (p. 84). Patterson also mentioned 2 other related issues in history. In this case, Patterson was able to convince the readers regarding the misclassification done that lead to the misinterpretation of the census result. Thus, Patterson erstwhile again established a ground for his ideas and arguments by nul lifying the classification do by the census bureau on the issue of which races are to be included as whites.As mentioned earlier, the author was able to establish the financial support facts about his claims. However, there are some instances that the author failed to mention sex act and important information. Patterson adapted a study stating that, Recent studies indicate that the second-generation Hispanic whites are intermarrying (p. 83). However, Patterson did not mention what particular study reaches that conclusion. Therefore, readers in doubt of that particular argument have no means of verifying the claim.Patterson should have indicated all the necessary information about the research to enable the readers to position the particular study, otherwise doubts will remain doubts in the minds of the readers. Although the article has its strengths, i. e. the use of statistical information, the helplessness of the article is readily available to the readers. The main weaknes s of the article was that the author, Mr. Patterson, was obviously one sided in writing the article. The bias can be seen from the very beginning of the article. Thus, this limits the trust of the readers and the integrity of the generator.Showing private biases is will really lead to doubts and disbeliefs of the authors claim since the readers are aware that he or she is arguing for or against one side. Thus, in persuading the readers about a certain action or issue, one moldiness show personal biases for this will weaken the arguments and the ideas presented by the author. In effectuate to establish a ground proof about an argument, a writer must not show biases as much as possible. It would be better to show the different arguments of both side and show carnal knowledge information, facts and evidences and let the readers decide which arguments weigh more basing from the given evidences.All in all, Patterson did a great job in laying the arguments and he was able to fulfil hi s main objective, to encourage the whites. However, as mentioned earlier, the article has its own weaknesses as well. Thus, the article would only be effective if the reader is taking the equivalent side as Pattersons, otherwise, the article would seem very racist of which whites are considered incomparable to others. The validity of the claims is thus, very subjective on the personality and side that the readers will take.